In recent discussions of the Redskins, a controversial issue has been whether the name should be changed. On one hand, some argue that there is much tradition in the name. From this perspective, the name is a compliment. On the other hand, however, others argue that it's extremely insulting. In the words of the Oneidans, one of the view's main proponents, the phrase is "a dictionary defined racial epithet." According to this view, the name should not be used. In sum, then, the issue is whether the Redskins can keep their name or have to change it.
My own view is that it should not be changed. Thought I concede that some may be insulted by it, I still maintain that we are trying to feel for those that we think should be insulted. For example, 9 out of 10 Native Americans are not insulted by it. Although some may object that its a racist term, I would reply that most are actually not insulted by the term. This issue is important because it deals with racism and political correctness
When you say that the proponents claim the term is a compliment, who do they claim to be complimenting? What about those who would claim that even if 10 out of 10 Native People were fine with it, it would STILL be racist? Is racism a matter of democratic vote?
ReplyDeleteWhat are the other reasons for you siding with those who think the name should stay the same?